Відео

12.4.2 도대체 언제 나오나? 머스크야...6월말에....원래 ..12.5.나온다 했다....사트 버전....

I can't see Tesla having a truck until it looks like something other than what I drew when I was 5 years old with the jumbo 8 pack of Crayolas

Totally agree. One of the first things I thought of when this update installed was that it has no confidence. Speed control and maneuver smoothness are also bad.

6:12 Tesla emergency breaking … don’t forget about this safety feature

Even if it did have a rear Axle, As the accident made the Vehicle a Complete 100% Write off why does it matter if rear is also damaged? Gonna get the same insurance for it anyways.

I’m seeing them everywhere!! But I’ve only seen one Hummer EV 😮

Imagine someone running from the cops and plowing through cars man that would be insane 😳

The driver did not hit the wrong petal.. you know what happend or you should. Get your facts straight. And they can't be stopped like the old days.

After toyota being exposed you still believe any crash test... yes of course you do.

As Europeans, my friend and I used to say that Americans buy gigantic "cars" to compensate for a lack of intelligence. It often seems like redneck people, angry dudes, or Karens are the ones driving those trucks in movies or series XD. (We use "car" for trucks too; for us, a truck is a big vehicle like a semi-truck, generally weighing more than 10 metric tons.)

Yea bro I’m having the exact same issues, hoping it gets addressed soon

I saw a cybertruck in new york queens while leaving it to go back home it looked obviosly wierd but it was honestly smaller than i thought

I’m surprised Tesla is allowed to use public roads to test their software. It’s definitely not ready to be in use on public roads. Really glad the US is taking the risk though. In 20-30 years it might get to a useable state and come to Australia.

I like this format very good

This feels more like my experience. I find myself having to intervene more than other videos I’ve seen. I also probably have less patience than those creating the videos.

That was a fun watch. I’m from the area and drive Walnut Creek often. Keep it up!

People would rather be mad at one car company/CEO, instead of all of them, whom lobby anti-pedestrian laws and policies, and pro-hyper obsession with adding lanes to already crowded cities, across the nation.

Although the resolution seems to be higher on hw4, every time i pause the video hw3 looks like a still photograph while hw4 has motion blur. What's the point of higher resolution if the details are lost during motion?

Try to get a body shop to work on Cybertruck after a crash.

not even the camera man would survive this

Stop crying and change your diapers

I think haters just pick up bits and pieces of information and blow it out of proportion. My Ford Excursion V10 weighting in at 9800 pound and it is my daily driver. It posts no more or no less danger to others sharing the road as any other vehicles.

I'd be more concerned about being on the outside. This thing is effectively a razor blade on wheels! Hitting something in a Cybertruck is nothing compared to being hit by a Cybertruck!

Soon as your pedestrian friendly Model 3 can tow my 18' trailer stacked 6' high with hay bales up an uneven >10% grass (well, OK more like weed) covered grade, bring it over Id like to see it. Until that your opinion of my truck is just a fart in the wind.

As an Australian, we deal with horrible car crashes from reckless drivers…and that comes from smaller cars. These “mini-trucks” are abominations. They’re monstrous and ugly cars essentially. I live in a country that takes road safety EXTREMELY seriously. I don’t even own a car because they’re too expensive. I find it completely revolting these awful looking vehicles are normalised in the USA. We hate shit like this. They take up too much space and are a danger to the community.

Cybertank

Thanks for your objectivity. I am tired of all the pumpers and their biased reviews because they bought the stock at its all time high and are hoping Elon will share their content to their financial benefit.

1:46 - "The others are doing what's called a front overlap, which is much easier to dissipate energy." What in the fuck are you talking about man, lmao. You're criticizing "x-perts" without knowing basic physics yourself.

lmao for the T bone accident you showed a clip of a non lightning f150 which is lighter than the lighting f150 so of course there would be a chance it wouldnt stay grounded...but that wouldnt fit your narrative...oh and ignore that you literally just before that clip said it wasnt fair to judge the full front on collision bc they werent the same type of accident test. 🤡 very different than what you tried to show lmao: ua-cam.com/video/KkMpXhpqyII/v-deo.html

Tesla are 🗑️. When they exploded they exploded. The videos on here shows that. I radler listen to Scotty kranmer he's a expert its 🗑️.

I recently drove a cybertruck, and i will say this. this is my favorite truck, and my favorite vehicle. for extreme efficiency and no fuel trips with 1000 mile range, i would simultaneously buy the aptera motors vehicle. but i still hope another company starts making the aptera type vehicle because the wait for aptera to deliver a vehicle is beyond frustrating.

I was recently reading about patents for gravity force fields or gravitational force fields. with force fields, inertia would be cancelled for both the occupants of the cybertruck, as well as anyone entering the force field of the cybertruck. its really simple technology and apparently the only reason its not yet mainstream is there are many technologies stuck in the research phase. people like john searl, ralph ring, ottis t. car, thomas townsend brown mastered these technologies approximately fifty years ago. i do think it would be great for the tech to be implemented into todays automobiles. this could potentially contribute to saving the over 45,000 deaths each year from automobile accidents alone, just in the us. and possibly reduce the over 3 million serious injuries related to automobile accidents. the cybertruck is a masterpiece at every level of design, ergonomics, and forethought. just add force fields and now we are talking about next level safety.

And this is why this piece of trash isnt even road legal in the EU and UK. Thank god we have standards.

It aint the trucks...... its the drivers.

An option to dealing with irrational drivers - can be to replace them all with FSD Teslas - then it's both safer and faster. But it just needs to be safe and effective not always confident as such things will improve over time..

I don’t get the pedestrian argument. As someone who has had to export video evidence for these types of accidents, the pedestrian usually FLYS through the air and hits the ground. The ground also very hard and unforgiving. Don’t get hit by any vehicle as a pedestrian you will end up in the hospital almost 100% of the time, or dead

Comment for the algo

I'll reserve my judgment until the wedge is tested by the IIHS or another independent org.

i just wanna be on the crash test floor and try this stuff out. what a fun job. technical, i'm sure. but fun

I would be blaring on the horn until that lady in the white car backed up. What an idiot.

Thanks for coming out early in the video and saying that the overlap test is easier than full frontal- really put into perspective youre yet another one of the armchair experts that is talking out their own ass

One word, SUPERVISED

I find that at a 4-way stop if you want to turn left, FSD is a bit too careful and hesitant, eben when it is your turn to turn.

Id rather have whiplash and be alive in a box then be in a box that wants to crumble and the fire fighters have to use the jaws of life to cut me out or even whatever might of got shoved into me.

Why do you keep saying "space grade," stainless steel. That's not a thing.

FSD is inconsistent per vehicle. I own two teslas and they are day and night when driving in FSD. My wife always complains about FSD. I didn’t believe her until I drove her car…

FSD 12.4.1 is soooo good that no one has it!

But our small gas powered sports cars that cant accelerate as fast, and in a crash the only one dying is the driver. Keep getting attacked and discontinued. Up until the early 2000s the only extremely fast cars you could get were small, light, unconfortable, rode rough, and had transmissions that were either manuals or automated manuals, and they drove like shit in traffic. So the only people getting them were people capable of driving these vehicles. And up until the 90s they were extremely unsafe for the people in it as they would crumble into little flaming pieces into a guardrail. Nowadays with these chonky fast electric mfers anyone can drive them. They are built to be extremely friendly for any person. And make people who have never driven a proper race car, drive at proper race car speeds. They'll have a very false sense of confidence, and wont know what is actually happenning at those speeds. Something like hydroplaining, a broken ball joint, a blown tire, random shit on the road etc, and they are going to plow straight thru whatever is in the way at mach jesus. James charles drives a damn cyber truck that cannot be safe whatsoever. Id rather everyone on the road was blacked out drunk in a regular sized vehicle, than james charles in a fucking cybertruck

The vehicles aren't the problem, the drivers are. Except with the TCT, then it's both.

I live in germany and went to Ikea a few months back to get something. I was driving an Opel Agila A 1.0 3 cylinder microvan. At the loading area, there was only one free parking spot, right next to a RAM 1500 (these trucks aren't common here, but every now and then you see one. I recently saw a Raptor as well). The bed of the truck was higher than the Opel, and I couldn't see anything when I tried to reverse back out of the spot. It's actually an amazing comparison, because that tiny old little Opel can easily fit a fridge, or washing mashine, and it almost looks like the RAM had a smaller bed, than the Opel had space with the seats folded down. I'm very fascinated by all things automotive, and I do think these trucks are pretty cool (I guess that's the inner child in me speaking), but it's quite literally a luxury status symbol now. Especially on the entry model trucks, which seem to have increasingly tinier beds as well. Even when you compare them to the american trucks of the 60s and 70s. We have a dealer here who specializes in importing classic american trucks, and those have ginormous beds, compared to the tiny cab size. Those were practical work trucks, that weren't supposed to heat your fingies and butt on the way to walmart, while you're listening to the newest Taylor Swift on your iPad sized infotainment system.